Page 372 - Resúmen - XXV Congreso Latinoamericano de Parasitología - FLAP
P. 372

S3-45



                Bovine brucellosis in Latin America: a systematic review and meta- analysis



               Bonilla-Aldana,  D.  Katterine ;  Trejo,  Adrián  Esteban ; Pérez-Vargas,  Soffia ;  Rivera-
                                              1
                                                                                                   1
                                                                          1
               Casa, Estefany ; Rodriguez Morales, Alfonso J.
                                                                  2
                                1
               1 Semillero de Zoonosis (SIZOO), Grupo de Investigación BIOECOS, Fundación Universitaria Autónoma de
               las Américas, Pereira, Risara;  Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira
                                          2

               Introduction:  Bovine  brucellosis  is  still  a  significant  public  health  problem  in  different  countries  with
               economical and zoonotic implications. Although relevant, there are no previous systematic reviews and
               meta-analysis about bovine brucellosis in Latin America. Methods: We performed a literature systematic
               review in six databases (Web of Sciences/Scopus/PubMed/SciELO/Lilacs/Google Scholar) to assess the
               seroprevalence of cattle to Brucella. A meta-analysis with random-effects model was performed to calculate
               the pooled prevalence, and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Measures of heterogeneity (Cochran's Q-
               statistic, I2 index, and τ2 test), were reported. Subgroup analyses were conducted by countries, subregions
               and years. Results: Till August 1, 2019, the literature search yielded 3403 articles, of  which 87 studies
               were fully valid for analysis. The pooled seroprevalence for Brucella at individual level (N=47,395,535) was
               5.1%  [95%CI(4.6%-5.7%);τ2=0.001;I2=99.989;Q=778210.586;  p<0.001],  highest  value  72.8%  (Mexico,
               2010). Studies from Mexico (n=1191) yield a seroprevalence of 56.3% [95%CI(23.5%-89.0%); I2=98.74;
               Q=79.464;p<0.001].  In  Costa  Rica  (n=547,863)  yield  1.5%  [95%CI(0.8%  2.2%);  I2=98.74;  Q=158.329;
               p<0.001]. By subregions, the highest seroprevalence is in Mexico, Central America and Caribbean islands,
               13.0%  [95%CI(11.0%-15.0%);I2=99.84;Q=6061.863;p<0.001].  The  lowest  in  Andean  subregion,  4.4%
               [95%CI(3.6%-5.2%);I2=99.99;Q=324353.800;p<0.001].  The  evolution  by  years  was  from  0.6%  in  2004
               reaching  40.2%  in  2010  and  ending  in  2019  with  12.2%.  Seroprevalence  was  associated  with  climate
               conditions in the region, associated with ONI (r2=0.8862; p=0.0002). Conclusions: The persistent high
               seroprevalence of bovine brucellosis would be related to social, natural and raising conditions, such as:
               climate  conditions  favoring  the  survival  and spread  of  pathogens  in  the environment;  farms  located  in
               regions bordering forest areas, in areas of difficult access to the veterinary service; extensive beef herds
               raised at pastures with different age and productive groups inter-mingled; and minimal concerns regarding
               hygiene practices and disease prevention measures. Bovine brucellosis has not been eliminated and needs
               to be considered with new tools for prevention and control, specially being a zoonosis.



























                                                             370
                                                                               RESÚMENES DE CARTELES
   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377